Research Fellow in Materials Chemistry - School of Chemistry - 101098 You should explicitly consider the amount of time being allocated to the project by the applicant in this assessment. Operations Manager - Clinical Research | Jobs | Imperial College London Creating a Full Proposal and Electronic Submission. All these approaches could demonstrate excellence so your judgement should not simply be based on which approach has been adopted. Applicants have been advised that their applications should be based on the information available at the point of submission and, if applicable, the known application specific impacts of COVID-19 should be accounted for. It should cover the context, importance, methodology and all the associated work and activities you propose to carry out that will make this a high-quality research programme. call/type/mode: Early Career Researchers International Collaboration Grants, case for support (8 pages, 2 on your track record and 6 on the scientific case). Graduated with a PhD in Mathematics from UCL in 2014, and a Master's in Physics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. Site is running on IP address 149.155.59.247, host name 149-155-59-247.uksbs.co.uk ( United Kingdom ) ping response time 10ms Excellent ping . Before starting an application, you will need to log in or create an account in Je-S. Once you have completed your application, make sure you submit document. Where applicants wish to include details on flexible working or a career break for reviewers to take into account in their assessment, they are not required to explain the personal circumstances that resulted in the need for this. F.D.G. EPSRC . The research excellence of the proposal, making reference to: The ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: The effectiveness of the proposed planning and management and whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified, making reference to: Feedback will not be provided following the prioritisation panel meeting. The NIA is an individual award which is intended to support the principal investigator in developing research independence, and the proposal should be developed accordingly. acknowledges support from EPSRC New Investigator Award (grant ref. This letter will only be seen by EPSRC and will not be sent to peer review. For more information on these EPSRC funding calls, visit the website >>. PDF The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council whether the proposal details potential outcomes and clearly identifies any potential impacts. Principal Investigator . SySCoRe arXiv:2302.12294v1 [eess.SY] 23 Feb 2023 Your project should typically last one to three years and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. Epsrc.ac.uk Site - hidefumi.motoretta.ca This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. The questions raised and answers will be compiled into a frequently asked questions document, which will be published shortly after the webinar. The prompts are given as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. 1423 . Ed Baines. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. However applicants are not expected to work in isolation but will benefit from support from the university and the environment in which they will be working. As impact should be an embedded activity in the research programme, you should also assess the suitability and appropriateness of the methodology to realise impact in the proposal. NERC - the Natural Environment Research Council Swindon. Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. Beyond the immediate use-case of CNNs for automation, there is an opportunity to leverage the internal representations learned by CNNs to perform large-scale data mining and support biological discovery. Your host organisations statement of support is important. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. 954 . Micromachines | Free Full-Text | Viscoelastic Particle Encapsulation This document is based on replies to a questionnaire sent to all teaching and research staff in the School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences. Reviewers are requested to comment on the degree of research excellence of the proposal, making reference to three key aspects: Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context, in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field. The justification of resources, taking up to two A4 sides, should explain the necessity of your requested resources to your research project, including implementing the Impact Plan. Thomas Kecker - Senior Lecturer in Mathematics - LinkedIn The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. Frequently asked questions - UKRI - Research Councils UK Fellowships | The University of Edinburgh Whether they are successful or unsuccessful, applicants who apply for an early career researcher international collaboration grant are still eligible to apply for a New Investigator Award. It is also a helpful technique to raise issues or concerns with the application in the form of explicit questions for the applicants. EPSRC new investigator award. NIA provide foundational funds to initiate a research group. We recommend that all attachments are uploaded into Je-S as Adobe Acrobat files (PDF) as uploading word documents can result in layout changes to the document. EP/S036490/1). It is particularly important that resources relating to these aspects are explicitly justified in terms of need, scale and nature of resource. Opportunity status: Upcoming Funders: Funding type: Fellowship Publication date: 27 January 2023 Opening date: 10 February 2023 9:00am UK time Closing date: 5 April 2023 4:00pm UK time Last updated: 27 January . 2021. Frequently asked questions and webinar questions (PDF, 420KB). joint research activities: scoping, feasibility, or proof of concept studies, programmes of exchange visits or staff secondments, up to 4,000,000 for this open funding route, up to 1,000,000 for the international development funding route, resources to enable different approaches to building and sustaining collaborations, which reduce the need to travel, proof of concept research activities for UK researchers exploring new international partnerships, principal investigator contact information, international partner name and organisation, if you will be applying for the open or international development funding route of this funding opportunity, description of research activities that will be undertaken, research disciplines you are associated with. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. However, prioritisation meetings generally find reviews most useful where they explicitly identify the main strengths and weaknesses in the application, while also giving a clear view on which should be accorded the greater significance and why. You will be asked to provide the following information: You are not required to have finalised all the details of your application by the time the intention to submit is made. Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact. for example, EPSRC New Investigator Awards or Fellowships. Find out more about the assessment process. EPSRC new investigator award - UKRI - Research Councils UK (PDF) Index Alphabetical listing by name | Ed Baines - Academia.edu https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-applicants/what-to-include-in-your-proposal/overview-of-information-needed-for-your-proposal, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system, preparing new proposals in light of EPSRCs policy on resubmissions, what makes a good project partner letter of support, how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance, Overview of information needed for your proposal, case for support totalling up to eight A4 sides, comprising up to two A4 sides for a track record, and six A4 sides describing proposed research and its context. It is important that researchers and their research teams are able to work flexibly and in a way that meets their personal circumstances. For general queries about EPSRC new investigator awards, please contact: Sign up for news, views, events and funding alerts. covering letter describing how your experience and career history fit with the guidance on eligibility: not seen by peer review, no page limit. Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity. The reviewer form asks reviewers to summarise their view of the application. . EPSRC staff offer their hints and tips on writing strong funding applications and tackle some of the common misconceptions around applying for EPSRC funding. The applicant is not expected to predict the impact of their research in terms of value, reach or significance, and therefore assessors should not: Drawing upon what the applicant has said, reviewers should comment on: The extent to which each bullet point is addressed will depend on the nature of the research proposed. Research has the ability to not only produce understanding, knowledge and value, but also unintended consequences, questions, ethical dilemmas and, at times, unexpected social transformations. . This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Complex, multifaceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. Sample Submission: 13 December 2023 Outline Deadline: 29 March 2023 Full Proposal Deadline: 13 June 2023 . EPSRC Archives - Research Support Blog - The University of Salford Blog New Investigator Awards cannot be used to provide support of any sort for a studentship. Think of this as your report to the prioritisation panel, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses you identified in the individual questions and then making a clear and explicit recommendation about whether or not you believe the application warrants funding. We encourage you to contact us first to discuss your proposal if you believe your research may cross research council boundaries. You should not use journal-based metrics, such as journal impact factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an investigators contributions, or to make funding decisions. You may request funding for staff costs, equipment and other items required to carry out the project, costs related to impact, and travel and subsistence. Text in embedded diagrams or pictures, numerical formulae or references can be smaller, as long as it is legible. The weighting between the remaining aspects will depend on the specific nature of the particular application. If your application is funded, some information from your application will be published through Grants on the Web (GoW), Gateway to Research (GtR) and Visualising our Portfolio (VOP). This opportunity will transition from Je-S to a new Funding Service after 30 March 2023. University of Glasgow - Schools - James Watt School of Engineering An NIA is not intended to be an alternative to a fellowship, standard mode grant or other similar funding mechanism. However, they are not subject to the same eligibility restrictions as new . You should note that your review will be sent back, unattributed, to the investigator, who will then be allowed the opportunity to comment on any factual errors and answer any specific queries you have raised. Although the majority of the application should lie within EPSRC remit, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaborations with international partners are welcomed. The decision of which scheme to apply for is for individuals to make in consultation with their research offices. A risk with part assessment is that it will miss the added value of the overall project (the whole ideally being greater than the sum of the parts) so even where you can only comment with authority on one aspect, it will be helpful to the panel to have your views on how compelling the arguments for the overall application are. whether the applicant has demonstrated that the research is timely what would happen if they didnt undertake this research now? New Investigator Award - EPSRC - Research Councils UK - Introduction-Tellthemtheoverallresearchgoal&convincethemyoucandeliverit. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter - 964 . Three written quotations are required for single items of equipment costing more than 138,000 and must accompany the proposal. PDF Research Funding Opportunities for New Investigators Green Transition Ecosystems - Swindon - NERC - the Natural Environment UKRI is implementing a standard method for inputting overseas costs on Je-S from 1 July 2021. The Adaptus Research Group It is important that EPSRC funds are used ethically and responsibly. EPSRC will not fund a project if it believes that there are ethical concerns that have been overlooked or not appropriately accounted for. For multidisciplinary proposals please state which aspects of the proposal you feel qualified to assess, contributes to or helps maintain the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry or industries, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity, complements other UK research funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, plans for dissemination and knowledge exchange with potential beneficiaries of the research, appropriateness of the track record of the applicant or applicants, unique and complementary contribution and expertise of the international partner or partners, appropriateness of the plans for developing the collaborative relationship with the international partner or partners, balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators, the level of the contribution made to this award from other sources including the UK institutions and international potential partners, any equipment requested, or the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third-party contribution, any resources requested for activities to either increase impact, for public engagement or to support responsible innovation. You and your international partners may have a previous relationship, but we do not expect you to have worked together extensively. The new investigator award is for people who hold an academic lectureship position at UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations and NHS bodies, and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. Questions can be submitted prior to the event using the EPSRC international team email address or during the webinar using the question and answer function. Guidance on completing ethical information on the Je-S form. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter - Get Started Instantly. Our project is a collaborative one between two Universities and a national laboratory working together across a combined theoretical and experimental programme. Wellcome Trust Research Fellow job in Coventry EPSRC assessment processes, including expert reviewing and panels, may acknowledge the impact of university contributions, but will not consider the level of matched university funding as a factor on which to base funding decisions. All attachments must be completed in single-spaced typescript in Arial 11 or other sans serif typeface of equivalent size, with margins of at least 2cm. Find out more about institutional eligibility. New Investigator Award: Starts: 05 January 2021: Ends: 04 August 2023: Value (): 243,689: . We will award 80% of the full economic costs of the project, and your organisation must agree to find the balance. This makes it easier for the panel to assess how complete and convincing the applicants responses are. You must submit an expression of interest to MRC using the Joint Electronic Submission (Je-S) system and case for support template.. To manage demand, individuals may only submit one expression of interest as a principal investigator. Please leave enough time for your proposal to pass through your organisations Je-S submission route before this date. The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. The New Investigator Award scheme is intended to support individuals who hold an academic lectureship position, and have not previously led a research group. existing engagements with relevant end users and the appropriateness of any partnerships. Under the NIA scheme, funding is typically sought for 10% to 20% of the principal investigators time. Applicants are permitted to only be involved with 1 application for this funding opportunity. support for other adjustments and adaptations that may be needed due to the personal or health circumstances of the principal investigator or their team. Now in its fifth edition, it is intended to provide an overview of research interests, to function as a guide for prospective (as well as current . Download the New Investigator peer review form. They should be completed in single-spaced 11 font Arial or similar sans serif typeface. Standard letters declaring general support for a project are often criticised by reviewers. For further information please see preparing new proposals in light of EPSRCs policy on resubmissions. For equipment in the range 25,000 to 138,000, quotations obtained verbally are acceptable and should be detailed in the proposal. Please note that while the criteria headings mirror EPSRCs standard criteria, additional aspects have been added to the applicant and partnerships and resources and management criteria, and the applicant and partnerships criterion has been made a primary criterion. If you do choose to look at this information, it is possible that your anonymity to the applicant will be compromised. It is preferable that collaborative partners will contribute cash to the project, although "tangible" material contributions from industrial collaborators may also be consider an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. Writing a Proposal | Lancaster University EPSRC is committed to support the recommendations and principles set out by the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Consequently, as part of our 2022 to 2025 delivery plan we will provide opportunities for our research and innovation base to connect with international leaders and facilitate joint working between the UK research community and their preferred global partners. Aviation-to-Grid: Grid flexibility through multiscale modelling and EPSRC: Early career researcher collaborations for global development Does the proposal specify routine and novel ways to engage end users or partners to help realise impacts? Our trusted research and innovation principles set out UKRIs expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration. Instead, they should describe the impacts on an individuals track record and career development. MCOS (RPS) Postgraduate Scholarship, MCOS (RPS) Sep 2006. Institutions may or may not . Your comments, scores and confidence level should explicitly reflect your views on those aspects you can assess, and you are asked not to moderate these in any way to reflect those areas you feel you cannot comment on. meet the eligibility criteria of EPSRC New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme. Case for support, totalling up to eight A4 sides, comprising up to two A4 sides for a track record, and six A4 sides describing proposed research and its context. EPSRC therefore allows applicants to tailor the support that they request in order to facilitate this. We will fund 80% of the full economic costs of your project. Your application must also include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDF documents to avoid errors. Select 'call search'. Position type Full time, fixed term. However, unless there are exceptional reasons why an organisation cannot meet the requirements to be a project partner, EPSRC will not accept letters of support. We would expect this to form part of the university support letter. There is no page limit for the Je-S attachment, but a maximum of three letters is permitted and letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. Your application is assessed by peer review. For example: The research councils Code of Conduct and policy on the governance of good research conduct outlines the expectation that applicants for research council funding are expected to observe the highest standards of integrity, honesty and professionalism and to embed good practice in every aspect of their work. The new investigator award supports both theoretical and experimental research projects across EPSRCs remit. Applicants are encouraged to have early discussions with their institutions to identify what training and development opportunities are available to meet their aspirations over the duration of the proposal. Find out more about the new investigator award expectationsincluding what we are looking for and the support expected from your host organisation. comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management, and on whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified. Posted on 14 February 2018. When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should assess the project as written, noting that any changes that the project might require in the future, which arise from the COVID-19 pandemic, will be resolved as a post-award issue by UKRI if the project is successful. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 February 2020: Ends: 31 January 2022: Value (): 246,055: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Mathematical Analysis: EPSRC Industrial Sector Classifications: No relevance to Underpinning Sectors: Related Grants: . EPSRC is fully committed to develop and promote responsible innovation. Encourage a greater degree of university support to aid career development. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter | Best Writing Service If, for any reason, you feel that you are not able to assess the application, please advise EPSRC accordingly. Where reference has been made to a period of flexible working or a career break, you should recognise that this is likely to affect productivity and career development, for example publication record, track record of securing funding, or the ability to build networks or to take up opportunities in a different geographical location. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. * SFI (Ireland) FNR . Dr Pierangelo Gobbo said: "Currently, the research field of bottom-up synthetic biology is trying to fill the gap between biology and chemistry to better understand . New Investigator Award - EPSRC - Research Councils UK For visiting researchers, include details of previous visits or collaborations with overseas researchers. The Vice Chancellor's Fellow at the School of Chemistry of the University of Bristol, has won an EPSRC New Investigator Award worth 392,000. The following information takes an ESRC Standard Grant application as a template but the information is also applicable to other funders. Researchers at UCL and University of Ghana have successfully predicted whether children have anaemia using only a set of smartphone images. For the purpose of research assessment, please consider the value and impact of all research outputs (including datasets, software, inventions, patents, preprints and other commercial activities) in addition to research publications. You will have the opportunity to respond to reviewer comments if your application gains enough support. You should also consider that this unequal impact may continue beyond the return to work. Other issues you might also comment on are the uniqueness (or otherwise) of the collaboration, the value of the contribution of the component you can judge, and the significance of this in terms of future potential development in your own field. Early career researcher international collaboration grants - UKRI Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. The clarity of presentation may help or hinder your ability to review an application, so a comment to this effect would be appropriate, but this should not become in any form a competition in stylish writing. Unless specified in the call or scheme guidance documentation, EPSRC does not require matched funding, either cash or in kind, to secure funding. This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. take the relative importance of identified impacts into account. Thus, how to . an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of EPSRC's New Investigator Award scheme. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. Co-Is and PDRAs are permitted. They should be read in conjunction with the reviewer principles.