A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . This is an inspiring and generous website. That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. I posted this as a person of experience. And so I had to do a paradoxical thing. I would still rather have the m10 over all the others though, but I definitely see you point. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. Its user interface is simple, uncluttered and largely very logical. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. Source: DxOMark. The M240 feels, well, fuller. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. Pasted as rich text. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. I am primarily a Nikon digital and film shooter, and my quest for minimalism and the fact that I already own a Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera were the major reasons to sell the digital Leica 262. Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. Of course it didnt. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. It unites decades of experience in rangefinder technology with groundbreaking digital technologies: It features a completely newly developed high-resolution full-format CMOS sensor that, in combination with its high-performance processor and the legendary M-Lenses; delivers outstanding . The M9 and CCD sensor. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. Or pictures are completely similar? Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. I was once very happy with my M9. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. I took the M240 because it offeres live view. It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. You can set minimum shutter speed either specifically, or based on the lens mounted. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. I upgraded from the M9 on single basis that I wanted a camera with a better screen. By The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). Its back to the basics. M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. To be fair, about 30 days of the last six months had the Leica in intensive care at Leica New Jersey so this is technically five months with the M262. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. Which is the better buy? Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. I will investigate that. You have to ask yourself, . Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! There are two things to be separated here. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. I will stick with my film Leica for now. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. I did, yes I have an M10-P now. The Leica M10 's physical controls are logical, simple, and offer the right amount of resistance. I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. I prefer live view for wider lenses to an external viewfinder. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? There is an M240 feature that can get you there with User Settings, and right now I cant recall how easily accessible that is.In Camera BW filter Simulations. First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. Privacy policy. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. RE: the ISO issue. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. To a degree, I can see their point too. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Unknown. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me.